Skip to content

PLOS is a non-profit organization on a mission to drive open science forward with measurable, meaningful change in research publishing, policy, and practice.

Building on a strong legacy of pioneering innovation, PLOS continues to be a catalyst, reimagining models to meet open science principles, removing barriers and promoting inclusion in knowledge creation and sharing, and publishing research outputs that enable everyone to learn from, reuse and build upon scientific knowledge.

We believe in a better future where science is open to all, for all.

PLOS BLOGS EveryONE

Worth a Thousand Words

This week’s PLoS ONE featured image is taken from a paper published today by Denver Fowler and colleagues at the Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University. In the article, entitled, Predatory Functional Morphology in Raptors: Interdigital Variation in Talon Size Is Related to Prey Restraint and Immobilisation Technique, the authors report that the feet of birds of prey or “raptors” vary considerably among different families in terms of both the curvature of the claws and the claws’ size distribution.

This image forms Figure 1 of PLoS ONE article e7999; any reuse should cite the authors and journal

The researchers studied birds from four different raptor families: Accipitridae (hawks, kites and eagles), Falconidae (falcons), Pandionidae (ospreys) and Strigiformes (owls). The featured image shows representative feet from each family: A) and B) represent the Accipitridae family (goshawk and red-tailed hawk, respectively), with enlarged talons on claws I and II; C) peregrine falcon is from the Falconidae family, with small talons and a slightly enlarged claw I; D) great grey owl shows the large talons and relatively little curvature on each digit characteristic of Strigiformes; and E) osprey (from the Pandionidae family) has enlarged, highly recurved talons on each digit.

Fowler and colleagues suggest that the variations in relative size and curvature of the talons across raptor families correlate with the differences in the techniques the birds employ to capture and immobilize their prey. For example, falcons attack their prey at great speed and the impact of this may immobilize the prey in itself. Hawks, eagles and owls, on the other hand, attack their prey on or near the ground and as the prey are less likely to be seriously wounded on capture, these raptors need to be able to restrain their struggling prey. The researchers also propose that the size and shape of the claws varies depending on the size of the prey (defined in terms of whether the prey can be contained entirely within the bird’s foot) and that if the size of the birds’ prey changed, this would necessitate a change in their immobilization strategy.

The evolutionary biology and ecology sections of the PLoS ONE website contain many more papers on similar topics and if you want to make sure you find out when new articles are published in PLoS ONE, you should check out our RSS feeds and eTOC alerts.

Donate and Join

Back to top